Archive for April, 2010

Composition? There’s an app for that.

The New York Times website has an awesome editorial blog on composition called the Score, which I peruse from time to time to keep updated with the whole “art music/classical” thing (whatever that means). Recently composer Jason Freeman posted a blog entitled “Compose Your Own” about his new etudes for piano that are entirely interactive. There is a page that one can go to that lets the user (the audience of the piece, basically) mix and match musical fragments to create a piece of music. The fragments cannot be strung together randomly – there’s a specific (yet flexible) framework governing where a fragment can go. There are four separate etudes, each with their own framework designed for creating a specific musical mood or effect. Some fragments can repeat indefinitely, some can’t.

The concept is totally awesome, and really should be looked at closely by anybody in the classical world who has bemoaned classical music’s fall from the public eye (in other words, everybody for the past 50 years). Although the composer has the ultimate say in the general feeling of the piece (they write the fragments and the rules governing how the fragments progress), the audience now can make important aesthetic decisions in terms of form, structure and musical effect. In a way, it’s similar to how somebody can mix and match a collection of loops in Apple’s Garage Band. It’s an easy way to bring the thrill and joy of writing music to the masses in a way that’s fun, accessible and meaningful. The added bonus of sharing the final creation on social media sites just underscores how hip this whole project is.

If you read some of the comments on the blog, however, you’d get the impression that Freeman’s etudes somehow represent everything that’s wrong about society and the downfall of classical music. One person wrote:

If you consider “paint by numbers” to be creating a painting, I suppose you could consider rearranging these musical fragments to be “composing”. In a world in which we prize instant gratification above all else, isn’t it great that now even chimps and lab rats can be composers! If you truly want to “share the experience” of composing music, teach music composition to those who have the passion and dedication to work hard, and thus learn about music and themselves. The richness of their discoveries can never be shared by those who simply rearrange the puzzle pieces you have created for them.

Apparently, there’s a reason why classical music is quite nearly obsolete. People like this don’t seem to get it. Music is the universal language – everybody understands it and can relate to it on a very intimate level, but unlike any other language, there are precious few who can speak it (ie, perform it), and even fewer who can write it (compose).  These educated people clearly are NOT the intended audience for composition projects like Freeman’s. Instead, he tries to harness that latent muse that exists in anybody who has ever decided one day that they want to write some poetry, or a book, or paint a painting, or create a sculpture from household items, or go out and dance despite never having done so before. The untrained layman who might want to write a song or write a piece of music should only have the option of years of passionate and dedicated study of composition if you believe that the person who left the above comment is correct in their sentiment. With Freeman’s etudes, now that layman has the option of tinkering in aesthetics and sharing in the wonderful world that is musical composition.

Just as important as tapping this muse for the masses is in the way it’s presented. Integrating composition with social media seems like the next great frontier for art music and composition in general. Social media is all about networks and connections, and for somebody to apply compositional techniques in this way to the brave new world of Web 2.0 is exactly what art music and music in general needs to reach the masses. Understanding how the young and the hip consume media and how they might consume art music is something that precious few in the classical world have considered, even with all of their whining about how nobody listens to classical music. Innovative and exciting compositions and compositional concepts like Freeman’s are exactly what is needed.

I smell an iPhone app.

playbass.com

Thomas Risell, aka, MarlowDK, recently asked me to contribute to his awesome bass educational website, playbassnow.com. For those of you who don’t know, Thomas is one of those few people who has monster groove, monster chops, monster knowledge and can teach concepts clearly and competently. Not too many people like that out there, for sure. So it definitely was an honor to be asked to write as a guest instructor, musing on whatever topic I felt like musing on. I mean, I do that anyway here and on YouTube, but it now at least has the appearance of being legitimate.

Check out my first lesson on minor pentatonic sequences. Sweet.

-Adam

AHM – Music!

So if you were among the two people who have kept up with my blogging here, you would have read all about my attempts at creating a nifty new system of harmony (I, II, III, IV, etc). I ran out of steam when I realized a couple things. One, the kind of harmonic techniques I was using created way too dense a texture to really be useful except in small doses. At some point it all just “sounds like harmony.” Two, and more importantly, although the harmonies and harmonic techniques I was coming up with sounded cool, I couldn’t really connect with the music I was making with them. Perhaps I was approaching the theoretical concepts from too academic an angle, or maybe I was focused too much on the harmonic applications of the modes to see some of the other aspects. Basically, I got bored with it, and moved on to other things.

However, I did compose an etude on gradational modulation, and got the lovely Emma Boroson to read it down for me (she wants me to let everybody know that its just a rough read down, although it sounds pretty darn good for a reading recording) Here it is.

Meditation (Recording)

Meditation (Score)

It’s…interesting I guess? I took a rather liberal interpretation of the technical guidelines I established on what exactly constitutes gradational modulation. With four voices, it’s pretty impossible to create fully-fledged modal voicings, and so often the individual harmonies have to “represent” modes within the framework of the system. I personally like how this sounds far better than a constant barrage of thick harmony, and lets the harmonies “melt” into one another far more easily. You still get the impression of a lot of “harmony,” but its tempered, and other aspects of the composition can come through a lot more.

I was considering doing a full on analysis of all of the changes of chord/modes and the specifics with the voicings I chose, but I think that there’s enough actual music in this composition that I don’t need to go through all of that. Plus, I’m lazy, so there we go.

Anyway, hope you all enjoyed.

Peace,

Adam

Exceptional Quality is Why Ticonderoga is the World’s Best Pencil!

I recently received word that I had been accepted into Manhattan School of Music’s graduate jazz composition program. This is probably the best program of its kind in the world (it’s a relatively new field in academia), with some of the best possible opportunities afforded to its students. Monthly score readings with jazz orchestras, private lessons with world-renowned composers (I’m hopefully to be studying with Jim McNeely, score!) and all sorts of awesome classes, I’d be in with the elite of the elite in one of the most prestigious Ivory Towers.

So I feel kind of bad that all I care about writing now is music like this.

Exceptional Quality is why Ticongeroga is the World’s Best Pencil

It’s actually a really involved piece of music – it’s serial (9-tone row), has a bunch of really complicated rhythmic concepts embedded within the concept, and was conceived as a blues. (I-VI-V-I chord progression, E-A-B-E, check it out) Yeah, that’s stretching, I know.

All that theoretical crap aside, I like it because for the most part its noise for the sake of noise. Noise is funny. Noise is annoying. Noise is obnoxious. Noise has balls. Noise is fun to play. Noise has passion. Noise has sweat. Noise has fire. The trick is figuring out how to contextualize it in way that it “makes sense.” Straight ahead jazz can only go so far with this, and free jazz often went too far. This attempt probably went too far as well, but it was an interesting juxtaposition – complicated prog-rock style rhythm and meter changes against pure noise. The 7/4 section almost sounds like Meshuggah, just with growly noisy saxophone in place of growled vocals.

So should I go tens of thousands of dollars in debt paying for an education that I would use to explore this side of music? Probably not. But it’s an idea I want to delve into at least a little bit more, with a little bit more rehearsal at the very least. Also, it’s really fun to make loud noises.

On a side note, here’s a video of that same session playing through a Mark Kilianski original. Its an insanely badass tune named Beef and Scrap metal that’s really fun to play. The audio is…a bit on the distorted side.


About

Welcome to Adam Neely's blog/website. Check out his compositions, links, and information about lessons on the top bar, and enjoy the music!

Twitter Updates

 

April 2010
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 157 other followers